«Данное сообщение (материал) создано и (или) распространено иностранным средством массовой информации, выполняющим функции иностранного агента, и (или) российским юридическим лицом, выполняющим функции иностранного агента»
Topic: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Blog Brand: Techland Region: Americas Tags: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Security, North America, and United States How Prize Competitions Can Help Fuel America’s AI Energy Revolution April 20, 2026 By: Nick Loris, and Adria Wilson
Share
Prize-based incentives can fast-track breakthroughs in AI and energy, cut red tape, mobilize private capital, and expand the number of US innovators.
Last November, President Donald Trump launched the Genesis Mission through an executive order (EO) that outlines 26 National Science and Technology Challenges, ranging from autonomous scientific labs to fusion energy to artificial intelligence (AI)-driven grid operations. Embedded in that order is a directive to use prize competitions to get there. This is a smart policy because prizes are a growing but still underutilized tool at the Department of Energy (DOE). Now the DOE needs to run with it.
How Prize Competitions Accelerate AI Innovation and Energy Technology Deployment
Prize competitions not only drive new solutions to market but also incentivize rapid innovation. Rather than picking winners upfront, they set a challenge and pay when someone solves it. Want faster grid interconnection? Offer a prize for the AI model that cuts the timeline in half. You want better nuclear licensing? Put up a purse for the tool that eliminates the paperwork bottleneck.
Prizes are also less risky for the federal government. They incentivize fast and innovative activity in the marketplace—something the market knows how to do well. They provide a strong incentive for a diffuse knowledge base, and critically, reward outcomes rather than outputs. It also requires less project management and internal risk for a DOE working to rapidly build new energy infrastructure for energy dominance, grid stabilization, and national security.
You want the government to run like a well-oiled machine and be a good steward of taxpayer dollars? Well, prizes aren’t miracle workers—and they aren’t the right tool for every job. But kidding aside, federal agencies are already using AI to improve efficiency and reduce administrative burdens. For programs where the problem is well-defined, the results are measurable, and competition will drive better outcomes, prizes can supercharge those efficiency gains. President Trump’s EO outlines why the Department of Energy’s Genesis Mission is so necessary. China is racing to dominate artificial intelligence and energy technologies. Not to mention, America’s energy grid is straining under new demands, and higher electric bills strain families’ budgets.
Overcoming Government Bureaucracy
The federal government has a big opportunity to use a new playbook. The US government has a well-earned reputation for slow processes and creating more roadblocks for startups than necessary. Despite the best intentions and civil servants committed to working around red tape to help energy startups get to market, bureaucratic timelines too often move at a glacial pace, especially across administrations with varied priorities.
The good news is DOE has used prizes before, and the results speak for themselves. DOE’s American-Made Challenges program has awarded over $100 million in prizes and helped launch hundreds of energy companies. Similarly, a recent article in the Journal of Technology Transfer outlined the successes of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)’s Grand Challenge in significantly accelerating robotics innovation and commercialization. The article documents how the challenge and prize challenges accelerated technology transfer by drawing in an unusually diverse mix of universities, defense contractors, and startups that would not otherwise have collaborated.
Prizes work through the fundamental idea that you don’t need to know who’s going to solve the problem; you need to determine the need and make it worth solving. And you typically get much more bang for your buck with follow-on private investment and partners. In the DARPA robotics example, competitors collectively invested an estimated 50 times the prize purse in private resources. A well-structured prize doesn’t just buy a solution; it can catalyze an entire innovation ecosystem around one, providing enormous positive economic and environmental spillovers in the process. Importantly, those benefits trickle down to the consumers through products and ideas that make their lives easier, safer, and happier.
A well-designed prize also gives the government a map: here are the innovators, here is the work worth backing. From there, its job is to build a pipeline of support that meets entrepreneurs where they are and grows with them: faster grants, flexible agreements, technical assistance timed to when it actually matters. Done right, prizes don’t just reward ingenuity. They create a foundation for the government to support it better.
AI Prize Programs for Energy, Science, and DOE Operations Under the Genesis Mission
That is why it is so critical that President Trump included prizes as a mechanism to achieve the goals outlined in the Genesis Mission. In a new paper, we outline how an AI for the American Innovation Prize Program (AI2) is a concrete way to do exactly that. The paper outlines three tracks scaled to the challenge: AI for Science, AI for Energy Innovation, and AI for DOE Operations. Prizes ranging from ten thousand dollars for targeted tool evaluations up to $100 million for genuine moonshot breakthroughs in scientific foundation models or fusion energy.
What makes this especially compelling isn’t just the structure, it’s who shows up. Prize competitions democratize innovation in ways traditional grants rarely do. The startup in Reno. The team of grad students who figured out a better quantum algorithm. The small energy firm that’s been working on a grid solution for three years without a government contract. The DOE scientist who is extremely frustrated by bureaucracy holding her work back. Prizes help unlock human ingenuity and entrepreneurial drive across the board.
That democratizing effect matters in the context of the challenges Genesis has identified. For these, the commercialization challenge is harder; private capital can be skittish early on, and the people who could solve the problem aren’t necessarily the ones who understand the government. Prizes are among the best tools we have for finding solvers.
Why AI-Driven Prize Competitions Strengthen US Energy Security and Competitiveness
America invented the internet, mapped the human genome, and put humans on the moon. We are not short on capacity for innovation. We are sometimes short on the creativity to unleash it, until now.
Prizes are not the only tool in the toolkit, but they are an extremely valuable one that can help the Trump administration accomplish policy objectives well beyond those set out in the Genesis Mission. Soliciting cutting-edge ideas from across the American innovation ecosystem will increase energy dominance, scientific leadership, national security, and economic competitiveness.
The Genesis Mission has set the mandate. The solutions are uncertain, but speed matters. If DOE implements AI2, it will provide the mechanism for talented and driven Americans to find the answers.
About the Authors: Nick Loris and Adria Wilson
Nick Loris is the executive vice president of Policy at C3 Solutions. He also serves as a senior advisor on energy and environment at Madrus, LLC, and serves on policy advisory boards at ConservAmerica and the American Conservation Coalition. Prior to joining C3 Solutions, Loris served as the deputy director of the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies and Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow in Energy and Environmental Policy at The Heritage Foundation. Loris has testified before Congress on energy, climate, and environmental issues and has been published and quoted in major newspapers. He holds a master’s degree in economics from George Mason University and a bachelor’s degree in economics, finance, and political science from Albright College.
Adria Wilson is the director of the innovation initiative at CleanEcon. She works with philanthropic partners, policymakers, and advocates to close systemic gaps in the federal innovation ecosystem, ensuring emerging technologies can scale, strengthen US competitiveness, and deliver durable climate impact. Previously, Adria led the zero-carbon innovation and emerging technology policy team at Breakthrough Energy. She began her career in energy and environmental policy as an AAAS congressional fellow in the US Senate. Adria earned a PhD in materials chemistry from Duke University and a BS in chemistry from Drexel University.
The post How Prize Competitions Can Help Fuel America’s AI Energy Revolution appeared first on The National Interest.
Источник: nationalinterest.org