«Данное сообщение (материал) создано и (или) распространено иностранным средством массовой информации, выполняющим функции иностранного агента, и (или) российским юридическим лицом, выполняющим функции иностранного агента»
A Ukrainian soldier trains with a “Baba Yaga” drone on Aug. 13, 2025 in Donbas. (Shutterstock/Jose Hernandez Camera 51)
Topic: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Digital Infrastructure, Military Administration, and Robotics Blog Brand: Techland Region: Americas, Asia, and Europe Tags: China, Drones, Ukraine, Ukraine War, and United States How Ukraine Can Help the US Compete in the Global Tech Race February 11, 2026 By: Iulia Lupse
Share
America should take lessons from a wartime tech ecosystem built on speed and experimentation.
Modern military competition is no longer decided by who invents first, but by who can learn, adapt, and scale faster. China seems to understand this. Its system moves new capabilities from civilian research to operational deployment with little friction.
This is evident across Ukraine’s defense innovation ecosystem, where innovation is not a distant, lab-based exercise, but real-time learning under pressure. A system is built, tested in live conditions, brought back with feedback, adjusted, and sent out again almost immediately. If it fails, it gets reworked and tried again, sometimes within the same operational window.
Speed Is Becoming the Core Measure of Power
That pace feels unfamiliar in Washington today—and that disconnect could cost the United States the global technology edge. American debates about competition with China still fixate on budgets, white papers, and long planning cycles, rather than on how fast new technologies move from idea to deployment and spread across the force.
This matters because technological advantage will soon define national power. The United States and China are competing across artificial intelligence (AI), autonomy, advanced manufacturing, and computing. Beijing is willing to pour massive state resources into these efforts and isn’t shy about pushing innovations straight into practical applications. Meanwhile, the United States still benefits from private innovation, but ironically, its own processes often slow good ideas before they ever reach users who could test and refine them at scale.
Ukraine’s Deployment-First Model of Innovation
Ukraine may be showing us how modern technological competition is actually won. According to Artem Moroz, head of investor relations at Brave1—a Ukrainian government-backed defense innovation hub launched in 2023—smaller private teams are building and deploying non–R&D‑heavy AI-enabled autonomy, unmanned systems, and edge‑computing tools to the front, with many of these systems reaching frontline units in three to six months. Once in use, frontline feedback drives changes so quickly that some teams iterate on their products multiple times a day.
The results are visible on the battlefield where Ukrainian forces are using inexpensive first-person view drones (FPV) to disable or destroy Russian equipment worth far more, not because they are perfect, but because they are constantly improving. Meanwhile, the software that guides these systems is evolving just as fast, with AI-enabled targeting, navigation, and counter-drone tools tested in electronic warfare conditions where systems either adapt or fail.
Edge computing plays a central role in making this speed possible. In jammed or degraded environments, Ukrainian systems cannot rely on constant links to distant data centers, so developers push more processing onto drones and sensors so they can operate independently.
Distributed Intelligence as a Strategic Advantage
Much of America’s AI development is still tied to massive, centralized data centers, which consumed about 4 percent of total US electricity in 2023 and could demand far more as AI use expands. Ukraine is proving that intelligence does not have to live in one place to be powerful. Systems built to think locally are cheaper to deploy, harder to knock out, and easier to spread across military, industrial, and civilian systems, such as enabling predictive maintenance in manufacturing to reduce factory downtime or real-time diagnostics in remote healthcare settings.
Much of the debate around Ukraine has focused on aid, but far less attention goes to what Ukraine actually represents as a live testing ground for technologies the United States will eventually need to integrate at home. Technological leadership depends on diffusion as much as invention. Britain’s advantage during the Industrial Revolution came from spreading steam power widely, and the United States surpassed Japan in computing during the 1990s, despite Japan’s early lead in hardware and semiconductors, by diffusing open PC standards, dominant software platforms, and internet technologies across industries and everyday life.
To be clear, Ukraine’s model should not be romanticized. The same decentralization that fuels speed has also produced fragmentation, duplicated research, and limits on scaling production for prolonged conflict. Small teams and startup-style procurement cannot sustain long wars against major industrial powers on their own. But those limits don’t change the larger point. Ukraine is giving Washington an urgent lesson in how to compete in fast-moving domains where battlefield losses generate data that drives design changes within days, showing how rapid iteration and frontline feedback can be deliberately embedded in larger, more structured defense systems.
Signs That Washington Is Starting to Absorb the Lessons from Ukraine
Those insights are now actively informing the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act’s shift toward outcomes-based acquisition, expanded rapid-contracting authorities, and a procurement culture that prioritizes deployment speed and real-world results over years-long requirements processes. China is already moving toward fewer platforms, tighter integration, and centralized production. According to US Office of Naval Intelligence estimates, its shipbuilding capacity alone exceeds that of the United States more than 200 times, giving Beijing the scale to absorb civilian technologies and push them into military use without years of delay.
Yet the US alternative, with long procurement cycles often dominated by a small number of prime contractors, is hardly faster or more adaptive, according to the Pentagon’s own assessments. In fast-moving domains like AI, autonomy, and electronic warfare, that structure struggles to learn at speed.
The Strategic Takeaway for the United States
Ukraine’s war has turned necessity into an advantage by forcing rapid learning in real conditions. Systems are tested against a capable adversary, improved based on actual use, and either scaled or discarded quickly. The lesson is not to copy Ukraine wholesale, but to absorb what works, such as faster testing, direct user feedback, and quicker diffusion of effective technologies before adversaries adapt.
If the United States wants to stay competitive in the global tech race, it will need to reward rapid deployment and diffusion, not just invention.
About the Author: Iulia Lupse
Iulia Lupse is the founder of I&A Communications Solutions and a contributor with Young Voices. She holds a BS in diplomacy and international relations from Seton Hall University, with a minor in Russian and Eastern European studies.
The post How Ukraine Can Help the US Compete in the Global Tech Race appeared first on The National Interest.
Источник: nationalinterest.org